The golder has an upper hand in every aspect of the game, esp if he's all try hard.

Well, he's gonna dominate, conquer a lot of land, easily boost morale and reinforce his army and whatnot while having a much larger army compared to the F2P player. Say, a player has 40k+ gold bars or even a million, and he spends a lot of it in a game. I've played for 10+ hours for 1-2 weeks on a campaign as a F2P player, and I noticed how gold bars ingame, the currency could give paying players ALL sorts of benefits from a lot of resources for gold, to boosting morale, army reinforcements, instant speedups for everything, researches and training the army, etc., so it is paid to win.

It's kinda fun, but gold changes everything. I'll give the game maybe a neutral rating. It's the same company, but they have 3 different conflicts of the game.

The same applies to the premium account.' The use of Gold is an explicit part of the game. The rules are written as it is: 'The denunciation of Goldmark is not permitted and leads to an immediate warning. In my case warning woks and I do not use map DE any more as there is no point in using it.'Īnother post saying, '1. Apparently it is denouncing micropayments which is, at least, is over interpretation leading to unnecessary bans. The OP said, 'Seriously - you cannot say anything that has word Gold, GMs or describes situation with their usage. The mods, GMs will censor you in their games because everyone who knows a bit about this game, knows that players with gold have all the advantages lol Here's a forum post pretty much if you talk about GMs, premium accounts, golders or P2W, then you'll get banned:

Call-of-war-1942